Stop down of parliament unlawful

HappyLion

Well-known member
#4
The British government will appeal at the UK supreme court against the latest decision, which also contradicts a decision in Johnson’s favour by senior English judges last week.

There's a president set. Its been done before and will be kicked out. As an aside Parliament is shut down on the order of the Queen, not the PM.

And should those that demonstrated and sang be shut out due to the way they treated Black Rod?

Makes me laugh when they say un-constitutional as we don't have a constitution.
 

ballsey

Well-known member
#13
Judges will always go against the prime minister and government when given the chance and the real reason is because the government set the tariffs for jail time, so they tie the judges hands and then the media have ago at the judges for giving light sentences
 

HappyLion

Well-known member
#14
Boost for Boris Johnson as ENGLISH judges say PM's Parliament shutdown CANNOT be legally challenged - hours after it was deemed illegal by Scottish court
  • High Court says decision to prorogue parliament was political and 'not a matter for the courts'
  • Ruling made by judges who dismissed case brought by Remainer leader Gina Miller
Now shut the F**K up.
 

HappyLion

Well-known member
#19
And another death throw:

The British prime minister has received a boost on Thursday as a judge in Belfast, Northern Ireland has dismissed a case that the governments Brexit strategy would damage the peace process.

The Good Friday Agreement was signed on 10 April 1998, which helped Ireland and Northern Ireland with better cross border co-operation.

The case brought against the government argued that a no-deal Brexit will undermine the Good Friday Agreement.


At Belfast’s High Court, Lord Justice Bernard McCloskey ruled against the case and said, the case has “inherently and unmistakably political to be beyond plausible dispute.”

The judge said in a written ruling, “I consider the characterisation of the subject matter of these proceedings as inherently and unmistakably political to be beyond plausible dispute.

“Virtually all of the assembled evidence belongs to the world of politics, both national and supra-national.

“Within the world of politics the well-recognised phenomena of claim and counterclaim, assertion and counter-assertion, allegation and denial, blow and counter-blow, alteration and modification of government policy, public statements, unpublished deliberations, posturing, strategy and tactics are the very essence of what is both countenanced and permitted in a democratic society.”

That above is why the other case will be kicked out.